Artic sea ice falls to record low

This article appeared on Monday, August 27, 2012 on page 2A of the Tampa Bay Times newspaper. It also included two satellite pictures detaing the differences from 1979 through August 26, 2012. The amount of sea ice in summer has declined more than 40% since satellite tracking began in the late 1970s, a trend that most scientest believe is primarily a consequence of human activity. "It's hard even for people like me to believe, to see that climate change is actually doing what our worst fears indicated," said Jennifer Francis, a Rutgers University scientest who studies the effect of sea ice on weather patterns. She also said, "It's starting to give me chills, to tell you the truth." Scientest forecasts based on computer modeling have long suggested that a time will come when the artic will be completely free of ice in the summer, perhaps by the middle of the century.

In my book I predicted that the artic ice would melt by the summer of 2025 (13 years from now) not in 38 more years as scientests predict. So far most of the items I have predicted have happened. But as long as the world's numerous (68) satellite companys keep escalating their satellite launches of over 900 launches per year and growing, the artic ice will melt well before even my prediction. We must put a stop to these useless launches, money making ($1,000,000.00) per lauch companies. Where are they going to spend their fortuntes when their is no food to buy, due to all the droughts these statellite launches will cause?   

Global warming suspected as huge iceberg breaks free

The above headline was printed on page 10A of the Tampa Bay Times newspaper on Wednesday, July 18, 2012. It said: An iceberg twice the size of Manhattan broke free from one of Greeland's largest glaciers, illustrating another dramatic change to the warming island. "It's dramtic. It's disturbing," said University of Delaware professor Andreas Muenchow, who was one of the first researchers to notice the break. "We have data for 150 years andwe see changes that we have not seen before." Researchers suspect global warming is to blame, but can't prove it. Glaciers do calve icebergs naturally, but what has happened in the last three years is unprecedented. Muenchow and other scientest say.

How long will it take for these scientest's and professor's to finally figure out what I stated in my book back in April of 2009? All the wild climatic weather that we are now encountering throughout the world are all due to the constant everyday firing of satellites from forty seven (47) countries all over the world. NASA has not released the latest size of the ozone hole since 2010. At that time the size of the ozone hole was 16.8 million square miles. I will assure you that the size of the current ozone hole is well over 18 million square miles. There are currently over 30,000 satellites circling over our atmosphere. How many more do we need? Can weathermen predict the weather any better now than they could in 1980? No, so what good is it to keep sending thousands more of these weather satellites into orbit? I realize that all these satellite companies are making millions of dollars everytime they launch a satellite. But when the earth is to the point that it can not produce enough crops to feed the world due to abundant droughts and floods that will be occuring because of the solar winds and flares coming in thriugh our depleted ozone hole, no monry can buy what is not available!

NASA's mission: sweep up space junk

Tampa Bay Times, February 20, 2012 had a story of how NASA is brainstorming for a solution to retrieve the more than 20,000 pieces of space junk that are orbiting the earth in a LEO (Low Earth Orbit) trajectory. NASA just gave $1.9 million to Star Technology and Research, a small company in South Carolina, to develop and test technologies for a spacecraft it calls the ElectroDynamic Debris Eliminator -- EDDE for short. Powered by a 6-mile wire -- make that "space tether" -- that generates energy as it is pulled through the Earth's magnetic field, EDDE would sidle up to a piece of space junk, whip out a disposable net to catch it and then move to a lower orbit, where air friction would coax the item to re-enter the atmosphere. EDDE, staying in orbit, would then move on to it's next target.

Does NASA really think that a 6-mile long space tether is going to isolate a piece of space junk traveling at a speed of over 7,000 mph? I hardly think so. Even if the satellite where to be retrieved, it would fall back into our atmosphere and planet and crash land on someone. Multiply this times more than 25,000 satellites that need to be retrieved and tell me what the percentages are that any of these units (satellites) would not fall, hit and kill civilians on earth when they crash. The solution is: Not sending additional satellites into orbit to destroy the protective ozone layer of the earth. My book states the ongoing problems that are present now which I stated in 2009 when the book was published.