The current extreme bad weather that the entire world is currently expierencing is due to the many satellite launchings that have occurred in this month of December! The current bad weater and high winds are due from the launching of the SpaceX test launh satellite that was launched on December 6, 2010 from Cape Canaveral Air Force Base in Florida.
It is not another coincidince that these high winds developed when an additional ozone hole that was created by the SpaceX satellite. The solar winds entered through the newly created hole, then hit the jet stream and created the high (50-60 mph) winds that brought the cold artic air from northern Canada into the United States. Even as far south as Florida, where the temperatures are dropping past the freezing point. 10 people have been killed so far from these unexpected low temperatures and freezing winds. The satellite that SpaceX sent up was just a test flight to prove to NASA that they (SpaceX Corp.) will be able to handle launchings to the Space Station when the Shuttle fleet is reired next year. SpaceX does not care if 10 or 1,000 people died due to their test flight launcing, they only want to prove to NASA that they can accomplish this fete in order to make MONEY!
Monday, December 13, 2010
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Extreme Temperatures in Russia and the United States
The recent extreme high temperatures in Russia along with their scortching fires throughout the country that have caused many lives not to mention the health risks involved. This population is having to wear masks in order not to inhale the heavy smoke from the fires. Tempertures in different parts of the United States have reached 105 degrees (in Yuma, Arizona yesterday) and we are only in the first part of the month in August. Newspaper articles have asked if the heat waves and fires could be associated with Global Warming?
You do not have to be a rocket scientist to attribute these conditions to Global Warming. Stop and think, what countries launch the most satellites and missions to the ISS (International Space Station)? Russia. Which country is second in these same types of launchings? NASA and the United States. You may have to be a rocket scientist to figure this out, but I will explain it to you. When the rockets from both Russia and the U.S. continously cut through the ozone layer and blow holes wide open in the ozone layer, solar winds and solar flares enter through these numerous holes and create extreme heat and high temperatures in the same regions in which
they were launced. All these facts are explained in my book. There is no guess work, it is real and it will get worse before it gets better if these launches are not stopped or at least reduced enough so that the ozone layer can recover.
You do not have to be a rocket scientist to attribute these conditions to Global Warming. Stop and think, what countries launch the most satellites and missions to the ISS (International Space Station)? Russia. Which country is second in these same types of launchings? NASA and the United States. You may have to be a rocket scientist to figure this out, but I will explain it to you. When the rockets from both Russia and the U.S. continously cut through the ozone layer and blow holes wide open in the ozone layer, solar winds and solar flares enter through these numerous holes and create extreme heat and high temperatures in the same regions in which
they were launced. All these facts are explained in my book. There is no guess work, it is real and it will get worse before it gets better if these launches are not stopped or at least reduced enough so that the ozone layer can recover.
Monday, May 31, 2010
Greenland, Ground Zero For Global Warming
The above title was on the cover page of the June issue of National Georaphic magazine. The article stated: True Colors, The changing Face of Greenland. There's a meltdown on the ice sheet-and optimism among Greenlanders. Vanishing Ice, Greenland's ice sheet once seemed too big to melt substantially. Now, as weather warms, the ice is disintergrating faster. Scientests think this could continue for centuries or even milenna, changing the island's geography and the planet's sea level. The article continues stating what the scientest's believe is causing the problem. It is: Solar Radiation. As average summer temperatures rise in Greenland, more ice melts. Surface water and dark cryoconite absorb solar heat, speeding the melting.
Solar Radiation, is transmitted through the open holes in the ozone layers when rockets penatrate there satellites through it. The solar flares and winds also enter through these holes. In turn, the flares together with the winds hit the jet stream causing cold fronts to rush into warm fronts that produce the climatic weather disasters we are experiencing everyday through out the world. Almost three decades of satellite data reveal an escalating trend in the extent of the ice melt zone--the part of the ice sheet where melting occurs between April and October. What will it take to prove to scientest's that this melting had never occurred until the past three decades? What has also increased 4,850% over the past three decades? Rocket/Satellite launches!
Solar Radiation, is transmitted through the open holes in the ozone layers when rockets penatrate there satellites through it. The solar flares and winds also enter through these holes. In turn, the flares together with the winds hit the jet stream causing cold fronts to rush into warm fronts that produce the climatic weather disasters we are experiencing everyday through out the world. Almost three decades of satellite data reveal an escalating trend in the extent of the ice melt zone--the part of the ice sheet where melting occurs between April and October. What will it take to prove to scientest's that this melting had never occurred until the past three decades? What has also increased 4,850% over the past three decades? Rocket/Satellite launches!
Friday, April 2, 2010
NASA plans big boost to climate research budget.
The above headline was printed in the Washington Post newspaper on Thursday, April 1, 2010 by Washinton Post Staff Writer Marc Kaufman. NASA officals laid out plans Wednesday to boost spending on climate research substantially over the next five years, to make up for cutbacks during the Bush administration. The boost increase totals over 62%, or $2.4 billion. NASA has 13 climate research satellites in orbit, which provide most of the needed information, but they are all old, with all but one well beyond their design lifetimes said Micheal Freilich, Earth Science Division director.The agency expects to have launched as many as 10 new missions by 2015 to collect information on issues such as ice coverage and ozone depletion.
Will NASA reveal that they themselves and the other 45 space agencies are the ones mainly responsible for melting ice glaciers and ozone depletion? I doubt this very much. NASA will probably blame El Nino, La Nina or something else other than themselves. Lets not forget that NASA brought forth the names and blamed El Nino & La Nina for all the climatic weather conditions that took place back in the 1970's. They will always be ready to blame anything or anyone but themselves. Ozone depletion in 1980 was documented at 235,000 square miles. The current ozone hole in 2009 is listed at 16.8 million square miles. The satellite launches in 1980 were a total of six (6). This years launches total 402, that is almost a 7,000% increase in the past 30 years. Can NASA still blame others? Sure they will, but all of us should realize the facts and know better!
Will NASA reveal that they themselves and the other 45 space agencies are the ones mainly responsible for melting ice glaciers and ozone depletion? I doubt this very much. NASA will probably blame El Nino, La Nina or something else other than themselves. Lets not forget that NASA brought forth the names and blamed El Nino & La Nina for all the climatic weather conditions that took place back in the 1970's. They will always be ready to blame anything or anyone but themselves. Ozone depletion in 1980 was documented at 235,000 square miles. The current ozone hole in 2009 is listed at 16.8 million square miles. The satellite launches in 1980 were a total of six (6). This years launches total 402, that is almost a 7,000% increase in the past 30 years. Can NASA still blame others? Sure they will, but all of us should realize the facts and know better!
Monday, March 22, 2010
Satellite manufacturers, launch providers may see downturn.
The above headline was posted in Avationweek.com on March 22, 2010: The telecom satellite industry will likely continue to withstand the economic downturn, but the trend may not extend to satellite manufacturers and launch providers. Satellite sales are expected to peek in 2011 and begin tapering off in 2012 through 2013, and while an upswing in low-Earth-orbit telecom and Earth-observation satellites will help compensate, the total value of LEO spacecraft will be less than 20% GEO sales, experts predict.
Satellite sales and launches are expected to peek in 2011. Notice that the total amount of sales and launches were not mentioned. This year there are 402 satellite launches scheduled, what will next years total launches be 500 or more? Regardless, that only indicates that launches will average more than 1.5 per day. You can rest assured that the ozone hole in Antarctica will enlarge from the current 16.8 to 17.5 million sqare miles or more. All the 2,000 plus weather satelltes currently orbiting Earth will not be able to predict weather patterns due to the constant bombardment of solar flares and winds that will enter through the newely depleted ozone holes.
Satellite sales and launches are expected to peek in 2011. Notice that the total amount of sales and launches were not mentioned. This year there are 402 satellite launches scheduled, what will next years total launches be 500 or more? Regardless, that only indicates that launches will average more than 1.5 per day. You can rest assured that the ozone hole in Antarctica will enlarge from the current 16.8 to 17.5 million sqare miles or more. All the 2,000 plus weather satelltes currently orbiting Earth will not be able to predict weather patterns due to the constant bombardment of solar flares and winds that will enter through the newely depleted ozone holes.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Total cost of for ISS so far, $100 Billion Dollars
An article in Monday's (02/22/10) St. Petersburg Times Newspaper on page 12 A, section Nation & World read: Shuttle defies forecasters for on-time night landing. Endeavour and its six astronauts returned safely Sunday, making a rare night landing to end a mission that resulted in the virtual completion of the International Space Station (ISS). The two new compartments were supplied by the European Space Agency at a cost of more than $400 million. Their addition brought the 11-year-old station to 98 percent completion. The space station, a joint project involving 16 countries, has cost around $100 billion, mostly funded by the United States.
Does anyone realize what that $100 billion could do for other projects that are a really needed?
Like saving Social Security, Medicare or helping to feed & house more than 1 million U.S. homeless people. The ISS is merely a cash cow for the 16 countries that conduct experiments in weight lessness for any companies that want to experiment at $1 million a pop. With the more than 19,000 plus satellites roaming loose without control in troposhere, don't be surprised to read or hear one morning that the ISS was destroyed by one of these out of control satellites. What do we receive in return for that $100 billion investment if this were to happen?
Does anyone realize what that $100 billion could do for other projects that are a really needed?
Like saving Social Security, Medicare or helping to feed & house more than 1 million U.S. homeless people. The ISS is merely a cash cow for the 16 countries that conduct experiments in weight lessness for any companies that want to experiment at $1 million a pop. With the more than 19,000 plus satellites roaming loose without control in troposhere, don't be surprised to read or hear one morning that the ISS was destroyed by one of these out of control satellites. What do we receive in return for that $100 billion investment if this were to happen?
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Satellite will keep tabs on solar storms
There was an article in Monday's St. Petersburg Times newspaper in section B, page 6 that read "Satellite will keep tabs on solar storms". A new NASA satellite could help predict powerful solar storms that cause havoc on Earth. The Solar Dynamics Observatory or SDO, is scheduled to lift off from the Kennedy Space Center on Tuesday (February 9, 2010) with instruments designed to analyze the sun's atmoshere, its surface and even its interior. SDO's total cost is projected to be $856 million, which covers five years of operation and six years of data analysis.
Why spend $856 million into operations and data analysis when I have all that detailed information in my book? In the book I explain in detail how the sun's solar flares and winds enter through the Earth's depleted ozone layer (caused by the more than 19,000+ satellite launchings over the past thirty years). Which in turn plays havoc on the World's jet stream driving cold fronts into hot fronts and causing the massive snow, rain and ice storms that are being encountered throughout our planet everyday. NASA needs to focus on other projects like finding an alternative fuel that does not blow a large hole into the ozone layer when they pass through it.
Why spend $856 million into operations and data analysis when I have all that detailed information in my book? In the book I explain in detail how the sun's solar flares and winds enter through the Earth's depleted ozone layer (caused by the more than 19,000+ satellite launchings over the past thirty years). Which in turn plays havoc on the World's jet stream driving cold fronts into hot fronts and causing the massive snow, rain and ice storms that are being encountered throughout our planet everyday. NASA needs to focus on other projects like finding an alternative fuel that does not blow a large hole into the ozone layer when they pass through it.
Monday, January 18, 2010
Earthquake in Haiti, triggered by satellite launch from French Guiana
The massive earthquake that struck Haiti on January 12, 2010 I believe was triggered by a weather satellite launch from French Guiana (just off the east coast of South America, about 600 miles southeast of Venezuela) on January 10, 2010. In my book "The Aerospace Assault on Planet Earth" in Chapter 4, Earthquakes, I explain how launches propel over 4 million pounds of thrust into the earths crust at take off and will damage and shakes the Earth's Fault Lines and Tectonic Plates. Along the eastern coast of South America there is the South American Plate that runs North & South and it attaches to the Caribbean plate which runs East to West under Haiti and the Domincan Republic. When there is a weak Tectonic Plate that is attached to any cross over Fault Line such as this one, 4 million pounds of thurst will certainly trigger a magnitude 7 earthquake along a weak Tetonic Plate. There had not been an earthquake of this size in Haiti for over 200 years. Would you consider this another coincidence? I think not! Also the frequent satellite launchings, 6, from Russia since January 10, 2010 are attached to Juan De Fuca Plate that attaches to Philippine Plate which finally attaches to the South American Plate. Total all these 7 launches that expelled over 28 million pounds of thrust onto the earths crust and see if a weak Tectonic Plate through out this planet does not break into an earthquake.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
