Artic sea ice falls to record low

This article appeared on Monday, August 27, 2012 on page 2A of the Tampa Bay Times newspaper. It also included two satellite pictures detaing the differences from 1979 through August 26, 2012. The amount of sea ice in summer has declined more than 40% since satellite tracking began in the late 1970s, a trend that most scientest believe is primarily a consequence of human activity. "It's hard even for people like me to believe, to see that climate change is actually doing what our worst fears indicated," said Jennifer Francis, a Rutgers University scientest who studies the effect of sea ice on weather patterns. She also said, "It's starting to give me chills, to tell you the truth." Scientest forecasts based on computer modeling have long suggested that a time will come when the artic will be completely free of ice in the summer, perhaps by the middle of the century.

In my book I predicted that the artic ice would melt by the summer of 2025 (13 years from now) not in 38 more years as scientests predict. So far most of the items I have predicted have happened. But as long as the world's numerous (68) satellite companys keep escalating their satellite launches of over 900 launches per year and growing, the artic ice will melt well before even my prediction. We must put a stop to these useless launches, money making ($1,000,000.00) per lauch companies. Where are they going to spend their fortuntes when their is no food to buy, due to all the droughts these statellite launches will cause?   

Global warming suspected as huge iceberg breaks free

The above headline was printed on page 10A of the Tampa Bay Times newspaper on Wednesday, July 18, 2012. It said: An iceberg twice the size of Manhattan broke free from one of Greeland's largest glaciers, illustrating another dramatic change to the warming island. "It's dramtic. It's disturbing," said University of Delaware professor Andreas Muenchow, who was one of the first researchers to notice the break. "We have data for 150 years andwe see changes that we have not seen before." Researchers suspect global warming is to blame, but can't prove it. Glaciers do calve icebergs naturally, but what has happened in the last three years is unprecedented. Muenchow and other scientest say.

How long will it take for these scientest's and professor's to finally figure out what I stated in my book back in April of 2009? All the wild climatic weather that we are now encountering throughout the world are all due to the constant everyday firing of satellites from forty seven (47) countries all over the world. NASA has not released the latest size of the ozone hole since 2010. At that time the size of the ozone hole was 16.8 million square miles. I will assure you that the size of the current ozone hole is well over 18 million square miles. There are currently over 30,000 satellites circling over our atmosphere. How many more do we need? Can weathermen predict the weather any better now than they could in 1980? No, so what good is it to keep sending thousands more of these weather satellites into orbit? I realize that all these satellite companies are making millions of dollars everytime they launch a satellite. But when the earth is to the point that it can not produce enough crops to feed the world due to abundant droughts and floods that will be occuring because of the solar winds and flares coming in thriugh our depleted ozone hole, no monry can buy what is not available!

NASA's mission: sweep up space junk

Tampa Bay Times, February 20, 2012 had a story of how NASA is brainstorming for a solution to retrieve the more than 20,000 pieces of space junk that are orbiting the earth in a LEO (Low Earth Orbit) trajectory. NASA just gave $1.9 million to Star Technology and Research, a small company in South Carolina, to develop and test technologies for a spacecraft it calls the ElectroDynamic Debris Eliminator -- EDDE for short. Powered by a 6-mile wire -- make that "space tether" -- that generates energy as it is pulled through the Earth's magnetic field, EDDE would sidle up to a piece of space junk, whip out a disposable net to catch it and then move to a lower orbit, where air friction would coax the item to re-enter the atmosphere. EDDE, staying in orbit, would then move on to it's next target.

Does NASA really think that a 6-mile long space tether is going to isolate a piece of space junk traveling at a speed of over 7,000 mph? I hardly think so. Even if the satellite where to be retrieved, it would fall back into our atmosphere and planet and crash land on someone. Multiply this times more than 25,000 satellites that need to be retrieved and tell me what the percentages are that any of these units (satellites) would not fall, hit and kill civilians on earth when they crash. The solution is: Not sending additional satellites into orbit to destroy the protective ozone layer of the earth. My book states the ongoing problems that are present now which I stated in 2009 when the book was published.

World's greenhouse gases Surge

New figures from the U.N. weather agency on Monday, 11/20/11 showed that the three biggest heat-trapping greenhouse in the atmosphere not only reached record levels last year but also were increasing at an ever-faster rate. "The growth rate is increasing every decade" said Jim Butler director of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Global Monitoring Division. "That's kind of scary" Scientists can't say exactly what levels of greenhouse are safe, but some fear a continued rise in global temperatures will lead to irreversible melting of some of the world's ice sheets and several-foot rise in sea levels over the centuries.

Here we go Again! Let's look at the facts: Recall back in the 1950's, 60's, 70's, and early 80's; The world's gasoline's contained lead. During these years cars did not have catalytic converters. There was no control on Freon, aerosol chemicals and refrigerant gases. All the electrical power plants were either coal, oil or gas fired plants. All the vehicles, chemical companies and power plants were emitting metric tons of CFC's daily. Yet from 1956 through 1980 there was NO OZONE HOLE. By 1982 the size of the newly discovered ozone hole (by NASA) was sized at 235,000 square miles. In 2010 the size of the ozone hole was at 16,920 miles. That's an increase of 7,200 percent. Today we have 141 Nuclear power plants that emit vapor (water) not CFC's. 80 of the old coal, oil and gas power plants have been closed. Plus, add the additional 61 new Nuclear plants into that total. There has been no lead in gasoline from 1978 through today due to the Clean Air Act law that was passed in 1996. All the vehicles manufactured since 1975 have catalytic converters automatically installed at the factories. Freon's, aerosol sprays, chemical compositions and refrigerants have been changed so as not to dispense any CFC's into the Atmosphere. Why would the size of the ozone hole increase from 235,000 square miles in 1982 to 16,920,00 square miles in 2010 with all the changes mentioned that have transpired in the past 31 years? The reasonable question to ask is what has increased from 1980 through 2010? Answer: The world's 47 Space Agencies with 51 Spaceports located throughout the world. The increase in 6 satellite launches in 1980 to 360 in 2010. That's a 6,000 percent increase in launches in a the last 30 years. STOP blaming the greenhouse gases and blame the real culprits, The world's 46 space agencies that are on schedule to launch 652 satellites by the end of this year. Why so many? GREED, the cost of a satellite launch is a minimum of $1,000,000.00. Where are the rich people at the Space Agencies going to spend there monies when there is no earth left?

Storms pound Southeast states, killing 4, injuring dozens

A strong storm system spawning several tornadoes hit the Southeast on Wednesday, November 16, 2011. Damaging dozens of homes and buildings. At least four people were killed and dozens more injured. Suspected tornadoes were reported from Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and through North and South Carolina. Forecasters blamed a cold front stretching from the Gulf of Mexico to the Northeast.

Another coincidence? There were two satellite launched from Russia on Monday, November 14th and another satellite launch from India on Tuesday, November 15th. As I have stated in my book many times. When these satellites are launched and burn holes in the Ozone layer, the solar winds and flares enter into our atmosphere through these holes. The Jet Stream then increases in excessive speeds that will drive cold fronts into warm fronts. Outcome, tornadoes, excessive winds and rains that develop into climatic weather disasters.

Planetary Trash!

In today's edition of the St. Petersburg Times newspaper on page 6A there was a picture and article that stated: Above us, Planetary trash. Earth needs to clean up it's space. Since the space age began 54 years ago (1957), civilization has littered the region just above the atmosphere with space junk (satellites). The picture of the computer generated image depicted the locations of thousands of pieces of such trash. Scientist's had plans to limit the cosmic rubbish but then two events, a 2007 Chinese antisatellite weapon test that put 150,000 pieces of debris into orbit and a 2009 crash of tw0 satellite's, doubled the number of fragments in orbit, says a report from National Research Council, a branch of the National Academy of Sciences.

I have stated this fact on numerous occasions in my book. Not one of the forty six countries, that have fifty three satellite launching stations throughout the planet sending satellite's into orbit a a rate of one or more a day care about the space junk that they are creating. All they care about is the money that they are making ($1,000,000.00) per satellite launch. How many more Weather, G.P.S.'s, Communication or Spy satellites do we need in our upper atmosphere? Currently, there are over 350,000 pieces of space junk orbiting our planet. Where will these 46 countries launching these satellites and making all this money be able to spend it when there is no earth left? Can the weather be predicted any better today then it was predicted 57 years ago? NO! Why waste more money, clutter up our atmosphere, deplete the ozone layer and destroy our planet just for GREED?

A 360 degree turnaround theory from John Casey!

I just read the book "Cold Sun" written by John L. Casey a former NASA engineer and former White House Policy Advisor! In his book, Casey has spelled out a compelling case that a new era has arrived. 1. Global Warming ended years ago. 2. the Sun has entered an ominous state of "hibernation". 3. The Earth's ocean and atmospheric temperatures are dropping rapidly and are now on a long term decline for the next 30 years. 4. Glacial ice worldwide is growing rapidly and the threat of rising sea levels is over. 5. How the ill-effects of current climate trends may lead to global agricultural devastation and social and economic upheaval!

My question to John L. Casey. On what planet has he been living on for the past 30 years? Certainly not here on earth! Global Warming ended years ago? How many years? Why do temperatures all over the world continue to get hotter each year. How can it be getting colder when the ozone hole is now at 16.8 million square miles. The suns rays easily flow through this gaping hole, that is why the people of Punta Areanas, Chile have no protection from the sun and their skin cancer rates are over 80%. Remember the heat from the flames from each rocket booster on the Shuttle is 6,400 degrees, two total: 12,800 degrees of heat and flames. the enormous hole that the shuttle burns up on every launch is devastating to the ozone layer. PLEASE Mr. Casey, I know you are probably trying to shift the blame in the opposite direction away from NASA, but get your facts from adequate and reliable sources, not from NASA! They have done enough damage to this planet. Thank God that the Shuttle program is finally over!